AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/071
*Corresponding Author: Türkan Toka Özer, Department of Medical Microbiology, Konya Hospital Şemsi Tebrizi Mah. Şerafettin cad. No: 95/A 42030 Karatay / Konya/Turkey.
Citation: Türkan Cengiz, Türkan Toka Özer, Refika Selimoğlu, Müfide Öncel.(2021) Prevalence and evaluation of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women. J. Women Health Care and Issues, 4(6); DOI:10.31579/2642-9756/071
Copyright: © 2021 Türkan Toka Özer, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Received: 05 April 2021 | Accepted: 13 May 2021 | Published: 07 June 2021
Keywords: asymptomatic bacteriuria; pregnancy; pyuria; urinalysis; urine culture
Introduction: Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is defined as the isolation of bacterial strain in quantitative counts ≥105cfu/mL in the urine without the presence of any symptoms. The aim of this study was to investigate prevalence and pathogen microorganisms of ASB, and the most appropriate diagnostic test in the fırst trimester of pregnancy.
Methods: In this study, 312 pregnant women were included. Midstream culture by conventional methods and urinalysis were done. By considering the urine culture as the gold standard, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of bacteriuria and pyuria were calculated.
Results: ASB prevalence was found at 6.7%. Specificity and sensitivity for bacteriuria were 77% and 100%. Specificity and sensitivity for pyuria was 65% and 61%. The common pathojens was E.coli (85.7%).
Conclusion: Pyuria and bacteriuria may not a major determinant of the ASB but may be useful as a screening test.
Running title: Asymptomatic Bacteriuria
Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB); without signs of infection in the urine is a count of colony more than 100,000 bacteria per ml [1]. The prevalence rates of ASB varies among pregnant women according to parity, race and socioeconomic status and geographical area, ranging from 2.5 to 12.5% [2, 3]. As a result of anatomical, hormonal and physiological changes in pregnancy, dilatation in the kidney collecting systems and ureters causes an increase in the volume of urine, ureteral reflux due to relaxation in the vesicourethral junction prepare the place for the proliferation of microorganisms [4, 5]. In addition, the decrease in the ability of the kidneys to concentrate urine reduces the antibacterial activity of urine. Physiological glycosuria and increased nutrients residues in the urine during pregnancy contributes to the proliferation of microorganism [6]. If ASB is not diagnosed and treated early, it causes 25-40% of symptomatic urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis, even urinary retention in the early postpartum period [7]. The most severe complication of ASB is acute pyelonephritis, which increases maternal and fetal morbidity [5, 8]. Wing et al. found that anemia, septicemia, acute pulmonary insufficiency, acute renal dysfunction, and spontaneous preterm deliveries were higher in patients with acute pyelonephritis [8]. ASB has been associated with preterm delivery, increased delivery of low birth weight infants, premature rupture of membranes, increased oligohydramnios/polyhydramnios, and increased incidence of recurrent pregnancy losses [9, 10, 11]. As a result of all this, both maternal and fetal morbidity is increased [11]. The diagnosis and treatment of ASB in the early stages of pregnancy can prevent at least two-thirds of these cases [12, 13]. For this reason, the American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend screening of bacteriuria in the first prenatal visit [3]. Nevertheless, the benefits and cost of screening ASB by routine urine culture in gestations are discussed [12, 14]. The most common microorganism in the ASB is Escherichia coli [15, 10]. ASB is seen more often in women with previous episodes of urinary tract infections, patients with anemia, patients with diabetes mellitus, urinary calculi or those with a history of congenital anomalies, those with low socioeconomic level and advanced maternal age. Sexual activity also increases the frequency of ASB [16, 17]. In some studies, there is no relationship between ASB, parity and gestational age [10]. A screening test is required to select for culture to reduce costs, to win time, and to reduce the workload of laboratories and to alleviate serious complications.
The aim of this study was to investigate prevalence and pathogen microorganisms of ASB, and as well as the most appropriate diagnostic test in the fırst trimester of pregnancy and whether urinalysis was an effective alternative screening test to urine culture test.
Urinalysis and urine culture were performed simultaneously in the first trimester pregnant women. A total of 674 pregnant’s files scanned retrospectively. In this study, 312 pregnant women with study criteria were included and evaluated. Gestational age, education status, occupation status, marital status, residence status (rural, urban), routine urine analysis and urine culture results were recorded from the files, including age, parity, urinary or urinary system complaints, use of antibiotics with any indications within the last 15 days (Table 1).
Follow-up culture results of patients treated with ASB in their initial cultures were recorded. Routine urine examination and culture results were analyzed. Non-pregnant women, those who took antibiotics with any indications within the last two weeks, second and third-trimester pregnancies, complaints and clinical findings related to the urinary system, those had contaminated in urine culture were excluded from the study (Table 2).
Inclusion criteria were considered that pregnant women in the first trimester with first prenatal visits outside of the exclusion criteria. Pregnancies with study criteria and simultaneous routine urine analysis and urine culture at the first prenatal visit were included in the study. The pregnancies were divided into groups according to their age and parity. Routine urinalysis and culture results were analyzed.
Midstream urine samples were taken after cleaning the urethral opening with an antiseptic towelette, with separation of labia and wiping from front to back. Urine specimens come to our laboratory within 15 minutes. Then routine urine examination, the culture, antibiotic susceptibility test was done. Patients treated with group B antibiotics according to the antibiotic susceptibility test. Following the treatment, the control culture was reconstituted after 1-2 weeks and a monthly culture was performed to monitor recurrence.
Nitrite was treated with the dipstick in urine and test was positive/negative according to color change. For the pyuria and bacteriuria, the 10 ml urine specimen was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min and then the sediment obtained was taken on a clean slide and examined under a microscope. If the dipstick urine test was positive for nitrite and bacteriuria in the direct urine microscope and those with ≥ 10 white blood cells (WBC) in every area scanned area were considered as positive. Urine samples were incubated on blood agar and EMB (Eosin-Methylene-Blue agar) for 18-24 hours at 37°C. Positive urine culture was defined as ≥100 000 colony forming units of a single species. The isolated microbes were subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing using the disk diffusion technique. Patients with bacteriuria and pyuria were compared with patients with positive urine culture results in the diagnosis of ASB [18, 19].
Statistical Analysis:
SPPS 16 package program was used for the analysis. We analyzed the sensitivity and specificity of bacteriuria and pyuria in urinalysis as an alternative to urine culture and descriptive statistics were expressed as mean±SD, nominal values as number and percentages. Pearson's Chi-Square exact test also was used for statistical correlations. p<0>
The socio-demographic findings of the studied pregnants were shown in Table 1. The distribution of cases not included in the study according to the exclusion criteria was shown in Table 2. According to urine culture; 21/312 (6.7%) pregnant women had ASB. When we evaluate the distribution of ASB frequency in age groups; ASB was detected in 10 out of 87 pregnancies (11.5%) in the age range of 15-24 (20 ± 0.45) years; 10 out of 180 (5.6%) pregnancies in the 25-34 (29 ± 2.65) age group; 1 out of 45 (2.2%) pregnancies in the 35-44 (38±3.15). When the results were evaluated by Pearson's Chi-Square exact test, the urine culture distribution was not different according to age groups (p = 0.079).
According to the results of culture, the distribution of pregnant women diagnosed with ASB according to parity; ASB was detected in 4 of 108 multiparous (3.7%) who delivered two or more deliveries, in 5 of the 99 nulliparous (5.1%), 12 of the 105 the primiparous (11.4%). According to the Pearson Chi-Square test, although the p-value of the primiparous seemed to be close to the significance level, ASB distribution was not different significantly according to parity (p = 0.057).
In the routine urinalysis, 1 case of nitrite test (4.76%), 2 cases (9.5%) of proteinuria, 114/312 (36.54%) of pyuria and 87/312 (27.88%) of bacteriuria were detected.
When we compared the results of the pyuria with the culture, culture positivity was found in 13 of the 114 (11.4%) pregnant women who had pyuria and 8 of 198(4%) pregnancies without pyuria (Table 3). The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of pyuria were calculated (0.62, 0.65, PPV = 0.11, NPV = 0.95), respectively, while culture results were considered as the gold standard. According to these results, 95% of the cases can be negative in culture.
PPV was so low that means culture was negative in many pyuria positive patients. Therefore culture positivity was not found in all pyuria positive patients. But NPV was found very high. This means that the probability of culture negativity was found as 95% in pyuria negative patients. When we compared the results of the bacteriuria with the culture that considered gold standard, we found that culture positivity in 21 (24.1%) of the 87 pregnant women who had bacteriuria and 0 (0%) of 225 pregnancies without bacteriuria (Table 3).
The specificity and sensitivity, PPV and NPV of bacteriuria were found at 77% and 100%, 0.24, 1.00 respectively. Bacteriuria has a very high NPV that means bacteriuria negative patients was found culture negative. None of the patients in bacteriuria negative group culture was positive. However, culture positivity was determined in 24 % of the bacteriuria (+).
Since our aim was not to investigate the predisposing factors for ASB, no comparison was made between ASB and socio-demographic characteristics of study participants except age and parity.
E. coli was found the most common microorganism in urine culture at a rate of 85.7 %, enterococci (9.5 %) in 2 cases, Klebsiella pneumoniae (4.76 %) in one case. It was determined that nitrite positivity in one case (4.76 %), proteinuria in 2 cases (9.5 %). ASB prevalence was found at 6.7 %. Patients with ASB treated with appropriate antibiotics for 5-7 days. After the end of treatment, no cases were positive in repeated urine cultures. Urinary tract infection has recurred only in one pregnant woman at later gestational weeks, she was followed by application of a long-term antibiotic treatment. Recurrences were not observed in follow-up with culture.
ASB in pregnancy leads to high morbidity in the maternal, fetal and neonatal period if early diagnosis and treatment are not performed. So, screening of the bacteriuria was recommended at the first prenatal visit [3]. While urinary culture is the gold standard in diagnosis, urine culture in all asymptomatic pregnancies increases the laboratory burden, and cases such as contamination of the urine sample lead to delayed diagnosis and increased cost and a faster screening test are required before the urine culture. For this, midstream urine specimens collected in sterile conditions to examine nitrite, leukocyte, and bacteria. We compared these results with urine culture results to investigate whether some findings in the routine urinalysis could be used as a screening test. If ASB was not treated, symptomatic urinary tract infections, acute pyelonephritis develop could develop in 30-40% of these cases. If ASB was treated, symptomatic urinary tract infections, acute pyelonephritis could develop in 3-4% of these cases [9]. Detection and treatment of ASB in the early stages of the pregnancy can prevent at least two-thirds of these cases [13, 20]. The rate of ASB during pregnancy was reported as 2-12.5% [2, 3]. in our study, it was found to be 6.7% and compatible with the literature findings. There were different notions about the predisposing factors for ASB in the literature and a full consensus was not provided [16, 17, 20, 21, 22]. ASB was not associated with age, parity, and prior urinary tract infections in some studies [10]. ASB was relatively high in the nulliparous group and 15-24 age group compared to other age and parity groups, but the result was not significant in this study. Thakur et al. found no association between age and parity and ASB [23]. Because of demographic data of the populations, statistical methods, number of cases, and differences in study designs, these differences in studies were seen. In our study, the specificity and sensitivity of pyuria were 0.65 and 0.62, PPV = 13/114 = 0.11 and NPV = 190/198 = 0.95, respectively. If the pyuria was positive, it was necessary to make a culture to confirm the presence of the ASB. Because leukocytes can be caused by inflammation in the genital system. However, someone with very high NPV and non-pyuria was likely to be negative for culture as 95% probability. The presence of the pyuria was not a prerequisite for the diagnosis of ASB, and the treatment according to the result of the pyuria will lead to unnecessary antibiotic use and side effects (allergy, diarrhea, candidiasis and antibiotic resistance development) [24]. In our study, the specificity and sensitivity of bacteriuria were 0.77 and 1.00, PPV = 0.24, NPV = 1.00, urine culture was negative in bacteriuria negative cases. According to these results, urine culture could not be done in the absence of bacteriuria. However, this study should be done in larger patient groups.
In our study, urine specimens were collected at any time of day rather than the first urine in the morning, and the evaluation was made based on whether bacteria were present, not by the number of bacteria.
We did not evaluate nitrite positivity in urine because it was detected only in one case. Although nitrites positivity may be used as a screening test, especially in the third world countries, the nitrite test was specific but not very sensitive [1, 25]. Many uropathogens (E. coli, Klebsiella, Proteus etc.) convert nitrate to nitrite and can be detected in the strip test. While nitrite positivity in dipstick test was significant, false positive results may develop. For example: consumption of certain foods that may affect the nitrite test, waiting for urine in the bladder more than 4 hours, contact of the strips with air can lead to false positives. After removing the strip, the cover should be closed immediately. On the other hand, diluted urine can be negative. Even if the result was negative, the urinary tract infection was not ruled out. In which case, other analysis should be made. The use of nitrite for screening urinary tract infections in particular ASB was associated with many false and negative results as compared to the gold standard culture method) [25, 26]
In some studies, recurrence was seen in one-third of cases had ASB in the first culture following treatment [27]. Our population was a more homogeneous group and there is no difference between ethnicity and religious belief. We thought that 232 (74.36%) of our cases had high school and high education, treated according to antibiotic susceptibility test result, perineum hygiene care, compliance with physician recommendations contribute to the absence of recurrence in our study.
The most frequent pathogens of ASB was E. coli (85.7 %) which is consistent with the literature [28, 29, 30].
Although urine culture remains the gold standard for diagnosis of ASB in pregnant women, it is time-and labor-intensive and patients may have difficulty providing uncontaminated samples. According to these results, pyuria and bacteriuria may not a major determinant of the ASB and culture positivity were not observed in any of the bacteriuria negative pregnant women. Because of the high NPV of pyuria and especially bacteriuria positivity for choosing the pregnant for urine culture, urinalysis may be useful as a screening test. E. coli is the most common cause of ASB.
The authors declare no conflict of interest and no funding.
Author contributions:
T.C., T.T.Ö., R.S., and M.Ö. participated in the design and conception of the study.
T.T.Ö.,R.S., and M.Ö. carried out the data collection.
R.S. and T.C. performed the statistical analysis.
T.C., T.T.Ö., R.S., and M.Ö. contributed to the review and interpretation of the results.
T.C., T.T.Ö., drafted the manuscript. All authors read, revised and approved the final manuscript.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
